We’ve
all heard the expression, “Don’t believe everything you see on the Internet.” InternetFactChecking.com,
a satirical essay published in the New Yorker, targeted that specific
expression head on by using humor to encourage to citizens to take that
expression to heart. The essay uses exemplification and a Q/A organization to
convey the absurdity of some things on the Internet, and therefore encourage
people to be cautious when using it.
The
author, Calvin Trillin’s use of exemplification shows the reader the dubious
nature of some information on the Internet. For example, Trillin includes an
example about how a single person used techniques to corner the world’s gluten
supply. Trillin states that since many groceries were now gluten-free, he read
on the Internet that, “someone has been buying up gluten (at bargain-basement
prices) and storing it in caves in Utah” (par. 3). Readers recognize the apparent
absurdity in this remark, which Trillin claims to have read on cashgab.com. By
showing this remark of dubious veracity, Trillin is able to convey that the
Internet is sometimes not a trustworthy area for correct information.
Trillin
also uses the Q/A organization throughout his essay to show the plight of
someone that might actually believe ridiculous claims on the Internet. This
organization is laid out like a letter, with Trillin posing as an alias asking
Internet sites about various claims that other sites make. Trillin writes after
discussing the Koch brothers’ relations to a mayor that, “Whoever told you that
you can’t believe everything on the Internet is a deeply cynical and
untrustworthy person” (par. 2). This satirical remark uses irony to show the
absurdity of claims on the Internet. By portraying people as untrustworthy,
Trillin uses irony to show that the Internet, which is untrustworthy, should be
a well-known, accepted fact. This process is repeated throughout the essay which
increases the strength of Trillin’s claim of fact.
Overall,
Triilin did a great job merging fact and humor throughout InternetFactChecking.com.
The absurd examples used and the organization of the essay show readers that
the Internet is in fact untrustworthy, and should be accepted as that. Triilin
therefore subtly makes a claim of policy in his essay, which is able to
effectively convince his audience of the Internet’s trustworthiness, or lack
thereof.
No comments:
Post a Comment